Do You Need Ruqyah Healing: Spiritual & Emotional Indicators

The page is live, but I recommend **immediately changing it to Draft or `noindex`**. It is not ready for public indexing.

**Critical Findings**

1. **The 494 records were not all scholar-verified.** Many automated root relationships have been promoted to “Verified Form” and “Word appears in the Quran.”
– `Adeel`, `Adeela`, and `Adil` cite verses containing related root forms, not necessarily those personal-name forms.
– `Adnan` cites 46:15 despite the earlier morphology review finding no supporting Quranic root/form.
– `Asif` cites 27:40, where the individual is not explicitly named as Asif.

2. All 494 rows show **Sayed** as reviewer on the same date. That does not establish the linguistic and scholarly review required by the methodology.

3. The live table has **12 columns, not 13**, and contains no primary-source links. Verse references are plain text, so readers cannot inspect the evidence.

4. There is **no `Dataset` schema** on the page.

5. The HTML title is truncated:
– `Quranic Name Reference – Scholar-Verified D | NoorNama`

6. The meta, Open Graph, and Twitter descriptions are raw table text beginning with the first records, rather than a controlled dataset description.

7. The page is currently indexable with `index, follow`, so inaccurate claims can enter search results now.

The deployed page is here: [Quranic Name Reference Dataset](https://islamic-names.com/quranic-name-reference-dataset/).

**Recommended immediate action:** set Page ID `31657` to Draft while we rebuild it with evidence tiers:

– `Explicitly named`
– `Exact Quranic surface form`
– `Quranic lemma`
– `Related Quranic root`
– `Historical/traditional attribution`

Only the first properly reviewed batch should be described as scholar-verified. The remaining records must not claim that the personal-name form appears in the Quran merely because a related root occurs.